A fast diagnosis flow for when you upload or edit a file, but the agent keeps referencing stale content.
This is one of the most common trust-break loops: you fix the document, ask again, and the answer still sounds like the old draft. Usually the file didn’t actually reach the active context (or the wrong copy is being used).
“I changed section 3, but it still quotes the old text.” Most cases are upload/context mismatch, not model quality.
proposal-v3.docx) so old and new copies are obvious.Paste this exactly after uploading your latest file:
Before doing any analysis:
1) confirm the exact filename you are using
2) quote one sentence that includes this marker: "[NEW-VERSION-MARKER]"
3) state whether any older similarly named files are also in context
If you cannot find that marker, stop and ask me to re-upload.
Add a unique marker like [NEW-VERSION-MARKER] to the updated file once, then remove it later. This instantly proves whether the agent can see the right copy.
If you keep reusing notes.docx, it’s easy to lose track of which version is active.
You uploaded in dashboard chat, then asked in Discord (or another thread). Same agent identity, different conversation context.
Very long chats can carry stale assumptions. A fresh thread + single latest file often resolves this immediately.
Easy mistake: local folder has multiple drafts with similar names and dates.
Use explicit versioning every time: project-brief-v1, project-brief-v2, project-brief-v3. Ask for one changed-line quote before deeper work.
You edited a Google Doc/Notion page, but uploaded an older exported .pdf/.docx. The agent can only use what you actually attached.
It’s common to have final-v3.docx in multiple folders. Confirm the local path before uploading so you don’t attach yesterday’s copy.
Users often re-upload in one place, then continue testing in another thread/surface. Keep upload + verification in the same active conversation.
If you skip a quote/marker check, stale-context issues can hide for many messages. Always require proof first.
If this keeps happening, use this stricter prompt instead:
Before doing any analysis:
1) confirm exact filename you are using
2) report any visible metadata you can access (for example file type/size)
3) quote one sentence containing this marker: "[NEW-VERSION-MARKER]"
4) list any other similarly named files currently in context
If marker is missing, stop and ask me to re-upload only the newest file.
Don’t continue for 20 messages assuming it will “eventually pick up” the new file. Verify with a changed-line quote first.